Do We Care? :: New Criticism Literature Essays

Do We C are? Many different forms of circumstantial theory focus on the textbookual matter, the circumstances surrounding the text, or the author, without acknowledging the indispens equal to(p) nature of literature. New Criticism proclaims that the essential components of any work of literature, whether lyric, narrative, or dramatic, are conceived to be words, images, and symbols, rather than character, thought, and plot (Abrams 246). New Historicism is grounded on the concepts that storey itself is non a set of fixed, objective facts, but, like the literature with which it interacts, a text which needs to be interpreted (249). Psychological criticism deals with a work of literature primarily as an expression, in fictional form, of the recount of mind and the construction of personality of the individual author (263). In these forms of little theory, the response of the endorser is less important than the author, the text, and whatever symbolism expertness be found in the text. While ignoring the importance of reader-response whitethorn be justified in academia, it also holds true that without the reader, the need for literature would not exist.What specific properties lend apprise to literature? Though style and structure are important components and should not be completely disregarded, the meaning of the text is dependent upon the individual reader, and as such, is highly subjective. In her essay, Contingencies of Value, Barbara Herrnstein metalworker states, the nurture of a work that is, its effectiveness in performing desired/able functions for some set of subjects is not independent of authorial design, labor, and skill . . . that what may be spoken of as the properties of the work its structure, features, qualities, and of course, its meaning are not fixed, given, or inherent in the work itself but are at every point the variable products of some subjects fundamental interaction with it (Richter 148). This brings up an interesting point if the readers interaction with the text proves to be less than what the reader expected or wanted, does it negate the value of the text as literature? And does the educational and cultural background of the reader have any kind of effect on this process? Smith believes it does. . . there are many people in the world who are not or are not yet, or choose not to be among the orthodoxly educated population of the West people who do not encounter Western classics at all or who encounter them under cultural and institutional conditions very different from those of American and European college professors and their students.