Saturday, February 9, 2019
Existentialistic Analysis of the Epilog of The Tempest :: Shakespeare Tempest
Existentialistic Analysis of the Epilog of The Tempest One whitethorn find it ridiculous to contrast between Shakespeare and existentialist philosophy in its twentieth century form, however one must keep in mind, that existentialism does not appear as a single philosophical system. It is to a greater extent an attitude of life, a general vision - existentialist Jean-Paul S craftre is known to crap stated that existentialism was never invented, it has always existed as the ultimate foundation. Upon that light, why not seek the foundations from the work of the forefather of every last(predicate) dramatists? It is above all nave to claim Prosperos Epilogue in Shakespeares typify The Tempest a mere conventional appeal for appla practice session or the stripping of the imaginary glamour built up by the plays magic. til now the greatest of artists would rather give away his life than surrender his art to be judged solely by the public. Art for an artistic genius is apt for its own sake art for the purpose of art. Existence for the sake of beingness itself - stripped of meaning, of value and of subjective interpretation. In its bear meaningless form, something whitewash remains the necessary Natural Law, a philosophical concept considered the grounding of human well-being, a system of the values that determine human existence. throughout The Tempest Prosperos character portrays an image of a nearly Nietzchean divine capable of disclaiming authority, killing God. He is in control of every incident and event as if the chain of causes and effects would be a conductible line of descent waiting for an artists touch. On the other hand he is very human a wronged duke and a father, a symbiosis which Shakespeare displayed with the use of Prosperos garment as a theatrical tool. An artist is the creator, the manufacturing business of realities yet he remains human, an animal with feelings and urges, ties only waiting to be cut. The view implied is not far from the ideologies that emerged from the great suffering of the second demesne war a man is capable of constructing himself a framework of personal and social meaning, but his true animal nature remains unchanged. In the heart of existence, life has no predefined meaning, it is a mere passage of natural selection from necessary birth to necessary death. Prosperos and his daughters situation on the island was hopeless, however Prospero had chosen a function for his life - revenge. Prospero created a meaning for his life, built a synthetic reality to keep him sane on the path towards the decisiveness of human death.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment