Essay on Correction Techniques Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

On Correction Techniques - Essay ExampleProbation, pardon and password be some kind of the roughly common corrective measures implemented by shepherds crook legal expert system to test the behaviour of the criminals who are sentenced. These mechanisms are normally performed to evaluate the success of the correction measures. This composition evaluates the differences between parole and probation and the extent to which probation is successful in correcting a criminal. Hertfordshire printer Frederic Rainer, a volunteer with the church building of England Temperence Society (CETS), writes to the society of his concern nearly the lack of help for those who come before the courts. He sends a donation of five shillings (25p) towards a fund for practical rescue work in the police courts. The CETS responds by appointing two missionaries to Southwark court with the initial aim of reclaiming drunkards. This forms the basis of the London Police Courts Mission (LPCM), whose missionaries w orked with magistrates to develop a system of releasing offenders on the condition that they kept in touch with the missionary and accepted guidance (Timeline A history of probation) The history of probation started from England as explained above. Probation conditions have been changed or modified periodically based on the feedbacks received from the experiences. Many people do not have awareness about the differences between probation and parole. ... On the other hand, a criminal on probation whitethorn have less supervision from the probation officers. Parole and probation are granted based on the Pre-Sentence Investigation report ( pounds per square inch) prepared by a probation officer. The practice of preparing PSI has started in 1920. Its original purpose was to provide information to the court on the defendants personalized history and criminal conduct in order to promote individualized sentencing (The History of the Pre-sentence Investigation Report, p.1). This report no rmally contains the background information of the criminal such as his crime history, crime tendency, family history, juvenile adjudications, definition of the crime, the defendants work history, marital status, financial status, length of residence in the community, educational background, medical history, substance cry out history, etc. Based on these information probation officers decide about the corrective measures needed for the criminal. For example, a criminal who has the history of series of criminal activities may normally get parole whereas first time criminals may normally get probation. Probation is the most liberal corrective mechanism. A judge can decide about the probation of the criminal after reviewing the nature of the crime and the character of the criminal. Fresh criminals may get probation in most of the cases. A violation of probation gives rise to a hearing on whether or not probation should be revoked (Kaman). If a criminal violates the conditions of prob ation, the judge or the probation officer has the right to withdraw the probation. In such cases, the criminal may get sentencing. On the other hand, parole is granted at the end of a prison status or in between the