DBQ Atomic Bomb Essay

In August of 1945, the United States launched two nuclear bombs on japan the first, in Hiroshima on August 6, and the s let outh in Nagasaki a few years later. in spite of the open diplomatic advantage to implementing one of the most fright weapons of that time, the United States tactics and goals behind dropping the atomic bombs were purely warfare mechanism oriented the political benefit was merely an added bonus. The atomic bomb was undeniable due to the Nipponeses refusal to surrender and the hundreds of thousands of lives at stake. Although thither were attempts at peace, Japan showed no signs of agreement towards a peaceful and unconditional surrender. Japans reluctance to stop fighting could return left to months more(prenominal) of fighting and thousands of more deaths.The atomic bomb ensured an enormous display that could pronto end the war. As Cuhrchill proclaimed, the end of the Nipponese war no eight-day calculateed upon the pouring in of their armies for t he final and perhaps protracted slaughter this incubus picture has vanished in its place the vision of the end of the whole war in one or two violent shocks (Doc E). Churchill summed up the nub of Americas reasoning for implementing the bombs. The United States did non contain to depend on the slaughter of one thousand millions of people in bloody, messy fights, and , instead, a nimble end to the Second World War could be reached with one machine (Doc E). However, once the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the Japanese continued to resist. It wasnt until a second bomb was dropped that Japan surrendered with a simple pledge that their emperor remain in his position.This alone proves the array necessity of the bombs. Despite the attack on Hiroshima, Japanese still wished to continue their war. If not for the second bomb, who know how many lives would have been lost. In Document B, General H. H. Arnold mentions that, crimson before the atomic bombs were dropped, Japan was a lready in a resign of disarray and on the verge of collapse (Doc B). His argument was that Japan would not have lasted much longer and would not have been able to hold up on a large-scale war (Doc B). However, despite this, the Japanese refused to surrender, and, though they may have been on the verge of a complete depletion of supplies and resources, there is no way to determine how long Japan could have or would have continued fighting. This could have meant months more of fighting andAmericans dying. As of July 1945, the Japanese army surmounted to over 5 million men (Doc A). Had the Japanese not surrendered- which they showed no inclination towards doing so until after Nagasaki was bombed- Americans, and possibly the Soviets, would have been faced with the enormous task of destroying an armed force of 5 million men in unfamiliar terrain with 5 thousand suicide bombers hit (Doc A). According to Henry Stimson, if the United States had continued with their original plans, a c ombine of naval blockades and land invasions- the war could have lasted until the latter part of 1946 (Doc A).The atomic bombs obviously affected diplomatic relations after implemented, but, despite the obvious benefits, the United State needed this advantage of nuclear weapons to win the war. Had the bombs not been implemented, Japan would not have surrender so quickly and peacefully, and hundreds of thousands of lives could have been lost in the fight for peace. Had the United States not come out with the bomb, Germany would have undoubtedly discovered it, and the results of Germany using the bomb would have been much more devastating than the results of Americas excursions. The bombs were definitely a military strategy to win the war and any diplomatic advantage was simply an added benefit that ensured future peace.